Skip to content

Failing Forward in Industrial Security

Presenter:

Mike Holcomb

Industrial security is fundamentally broken—not because teams aren’t trying, but because they’re learning the wrong lessons from failure. The path forward is to embrace failure as a learning mechanism instead of hiding it or treating it as an endpoint.

Key takeaways

  • Failure is constant—and necessary
    In OT environments, things will break. The goal isn’t perfection—it’s learning faster than the attacker and adapting in real time.
  • The industry hides its mistakes
    • Failures don’t get shared
    • Near-misses and lessons learned stay buried
    • Everyone keeps repeating the same errors as a result
  • OT security is learned, not installed
    • You can’t secure what you don’t understand
    • IT-style controls fail when applied blindly to industrial systems
    • Real understanding comes from hands-on experience with how plants actually run
  • The IT/OT gap is still the root problem
    • IT teams don’t understand physical consequences
    • OT teams don’t always understand cyber risk
    • That disconnect creates fragile, exploitable environments
  • Training needs to mirror reality
    • Lab work, simulations, and failure scenarios matter more than theory
    • Practitioners need to see how attacks translate into physical impact
  • Resilience > prevention
    • You won’t stop everything
    • What matters is how systems respond, recover, and keep operating

Latest

Cybersecurity Is More Than Keyboards and Dashboards

Cybersecurity Is More Than Keyboards and Dashboards

Cybersecurity is more than keyboards, dashboards, and job titles. At CYBR.SEC.Community, we’re researching the broader ecosystem of roles, skills, and people that make this community work—and why that broader view should encourage more people to find their place in it.